tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2100054477013501859.post4731561358718875103..comments2023-10-29T06:33:26.576-07:00Comments on Oil Is Mastery: Gravity In The Garbage CanOilIsMasteryhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13457713647671999890noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2100054477013501859.post-18517476966619226532008-12-16T12:43:00.000-08:002008-12-16T12:43:00.000-08:00BASIC PROBLEM WITH GRAVITATIONAL MODELIf the gravi...BASIC PROBLEM WITH GRAVITATIONAL MODEL<BR/><BR/>If the gravitational model fails with regards to solar system formation, then it likely fails all-the-way-around up to and including galaxy formation.<BR/><BR/>Hotwater for the "big bang, black hole" gang who can't shoot straight:-)<BR/><BR/>And, of course, this opens the way for Plasma Cosmology because it does explain solar system formation and galaxy formation, nice.Anacondahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05522474791573134808noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2100054477013501859.post-34316844149915007292008-12-15T22:18:00.000-08:002008-12-15T22:18:00.000-08:00Quantum_Flux:A lot of the original "big bang" folk...Quantum_Flux:<BR/><BR/>A lot of the original "big bang" folks wanted an "alpha", in a way they were creationists.<BR/><BR/>The "big bang" theory was quickly taken to the Vatican, and it was quietly given the Pope's blessing because of exactly that: It postulated a "beginning" maybe 20 billion years ago, but still, a beginning...as, "In the beginning..."<BR/><BR/>The Church could work with that...<BR/><BR/>"Big bang" is the worst kind of rank speculation -- set aside all the known physical laws...<BR/><BR/>A miracle...<BR/><BR/>As I've written before, science doesn't do "miracles".Anacondahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05522474791573134808noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2100054477013501859.post-53360866444778772642008-12-15T13:09:00.000-08:002008-12-15T13:09:00.000-08:00correction..hypodimensional <4d; hyperdimension...correction..hypodimensional <4d; hyperdimensional >4d.Quantum_Fluxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09383025356536602044noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2100054477013501859.post-25226720285546560372008-12-15T13:07:00.000-08:002008-12-15T13:07:00.000-08:00IMO: I think that nobody can trace the expansion ...IMO: I think that nobody can trace the expansion of the universe back to a single point. How could the astronomers tell the difference between tracing the universe back to 1 point or tracing it back to many points in the general same location? What if there was a dominoe effect of big bang explosions in a cicular or spiral pattern instead of some singular cosmic point source? How do they know that what exploded didn't look like an oblate or elongated spheroid or perhaps something that was hyperdimensional (<4d) or perhaps it was hypodimensional (>4d) gemotry or perhaps even a fractal dimensional object (non-integer) that exploded?Quantum_Fluxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09383025356536602044noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2100054477013501859.post-4885266801318948422008-12-15T12:00:00.000-08:002008-12-15T12:00:00.000-08:00What do you think about this exponential time scal...What do you think about this exponential time scale model (which was countered by the proposed 'stretching of spacetime' concept):<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.crystalinks.com/bigbang2.jpg" REL="nofollow">Big Bang Cosmology</A><BR/><BR/>According to this traditional Big Bang Model, fast acting nuclear forces took effect in the first second and then the universe is mostly electromagnetic charged plasma for the first 1 billion years, then the giant gas clouds conglomerate together under gravitation to form 1st and 2nd generation galaxies and stars that we see today?<BR/><BR/>Perhaps much of the ideas from the Big Bang Theory (such as nuclear reaction rates and electron/proton plasma collection settling rates) represents much of the data collected from all the <A HREF="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7278951069225366106" REL="nofollow">atomic bomb testing</A> and <A HREF="http://science.howstuffworks.com/atom-smasher.htm" REL="nofollow">atom smashing</A> that was performed during the '50s and '60s in combination with the observations of believed 'redshifts' through the hubble telescope since the '90s and all the ground based telescope data since the 1930s that Einstien worked through (BTW: I think Einstein was originally a hydrologist and then a patent office worker before becoming a mathematician).Quantum_Fluxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09383025356536602044noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2100054477013501859.post-55053075223025787032008-12-15T11:12:00.000-08:002008-12-15T11:12:00.000-08:00I think so too...=)I think so too...=)OilIsMasteryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13457713647671999890noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2100054477013501859.post-30214463589042257202008-12-15T11:10:00.000-08:002008-12-15T11:10:00.000-08:00I think that electricity is mainly responsible for...I think that electricity is mainly responsible for the formation of interstellar dust clouds, perhaps so for all of the "missing dark matter" that astrophysicists tend to talk so much about.Quantum_Fluxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09383025356536602044noreply@blogger.com