The question now is: did a hobbit find the Ring of Gyges?
Science Daily: 'Hobbits' Are a New Human Species, According to Statistical Analysis of Fossils.
ScienceDaily (Nov. 19, 2009) — Researchers from Stony Brook University Medical Center in New York have confirmed that Homo floresiensis is a genuine ancient human species and not a descendant of healthy humans dwarfed by disease. Using statistical analysis on skeletal remains of a well-preserved female specimen, researchers determined the "hobbit" to be a distinct species and not a genetically flawed version of modern humans.
Viva la evolucion!
ReplyDeleteI'd always hoped they were a "new" species, but any definitive answer to just who they were is awesome.
JK,
ReplyDeleteNote OIM's word play. The science - through statistical analysis - arrives at a conclusion that Hobbits are a new species, that means one science did not know.
OIM changes that hobbits are an old species.
Also, take a look at this link on UFOs in religious art!
http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2007/07/30/ufos-in-sacred-works-of-art-not-all-that-they-initially-appear-to-be/
This was in July 2007! OIM took the pic and began the beam-fucking Mary.
KV,
ReplyDeleteThey are an old species.
And with regard to the science of exobiology which atheists don't believe in see here.
Did Homo sapiens magically evolve from hobbits 18,000 years ago?
ReplyDeleteThere is no such thing as magic. As for the age of homo sapiens we've talked about that, too. I won't get into that again with you.
If you are serious about the question (something I doubt with all of my being) then you are more clueless than I imagine you to be.
(And that's a lot)
Note OIM's word play. The science - through statistical analysis - arrives at a conclusion that Hobbits are a new species, that means one science did not know.
ReplyDeleteThey use the word new because it was thought that they might be some kind of homo sapiens. Oils can't comprehend how actual scientists speak...it's not his fault. He was born'd that way.
OIM,
ReplyDeleteHobbits are not "old", but extinct, and as far as science is concerned it is a "new" knowledge.
Science learns either through new evidence or through new observation, or through new or refined analysis and revises reflecting new knowledge through peer reviews.
Unfortunately bible degenerates through misrepresentation by people like you, probably brain-fucked by the wimpy beamers.
Jeffery,
ReplyDelete"There is no such thing as magic."
LOL. Funny only it's not true.
Magic is so real that Anaxilaus of Larissa was banned from Rome by Augustus for the very real crime of being a Harry Potter.
Jeffery,
ReplyDeleteSo the hobbits evolved from man?
Does that mean they were more intelligent and evolved than us?
KV,
ReplyDeleteNo one cares about reality "as far as science is concerned." Science is retarded.
This discovery was made almost 6 years ago.
I was wondering whether H. florisiensis, and now I know! :) (BTW- I already suspected as much!)
ReplyDeleteKV-
ReplyDeleteNow look at who's being a "horse's a**!" Hmm?
OiM-
Science can not possibly "retarded" as the context of that word refers to intelligence and, as science is only term used to describe concise, experimentation and rational explanation of the Universe and not an organism, or even a human for that matter.
Second of all, I ask you not to use that word again as it is a sign of ignorance and an insult to those with Down's Syndrome and Fragile-X Syndrome. So, behalf of them and others with Special Needs including Autism and Autism Spectrum disorders, I ask you politely to refrain from using derogatory, belligerent language in these contexts and I request an apology. Not a coerced apology, but a sincere one. I will not follow this blog anymore and I may block you from PaleoQuest, so I ask you to refrain from this diction and apologize to not just me, but to ALL of those with Special Needs.
Someone believing something doesn't make it true.
ReplyDeleteYou believe the Earth expands... It's not true.
I think I'm taller and smarter than I am... it's not true.
I think Disciples of the Dark Gods is the greatest RPG product ever written, by maybe that's not true either.
Augustus' superstition is not upheld by evidence.
Raptor,
ReplyDeleteWhat about others who are just retarded, say brain injury, may be caused by beams from wimps? By the way, did you notice you self-appointed yourself to ask for apology for those who could care less about this blog, unless of course, you are suffering from retardation.
You do write well, but without any logic or context, it is called Palin Syndrome. So, you are the horse's ass. And, by the way, ass is a fine word, you don't need to use a** here, or at your blog.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteOils, which best fits the meaning of your message?
ReplyDeletehttp://dictionary.reference.com/browse/retard
retard
- 5 dictionary results
/rɪˈtɑrd, for 1–3, 5; ˈritɑrd for 4/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [ri-tahrd, for 1–3, 5; ree-tahrd for 4] Show IPA
Use retard in a Sentence
See web results for retard
See images of retard
–verb (used with object)
1. to make slow; delay the development or progress of (an action, process, etc.); hinder or impede.
–verb (used without object)
2. to be delayed.
–noun
3. a slowing down, diminution, or hindrance, as in a machine.
4. Slang: Disparaging.
a. a mentally retarded person.
b. a person who is stupid, obtuse, or ineffective in some way: a hopeless social retard.
5. Automotive, Machinery. an adjustment made in the setting of the distributor of an internal-combustion engine so that the spark for ignition in each cylinder is generated later in the cycle.
Compare advance.
Origin:
1480–90; < L retardāre to delay, protract, equiv. to re- re- + tardāre to loiter, be slow, deriv. of tardus slow; see tardy
Related forms:
re⋅tard⋅ing⋅ly, adverb
Synonyms:
1. obstruct, check.
Antonyms:
1. accelerate.
Dictionary.com Unabridged
Based on the Random House Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2009.