Wednesday, July 1, 2009

How Planets Can Reverse Their Rotations

Rick Crammond, age 52 of Canada, demonstrates how his invention, the Tesla CD Turbine, is a perfect electromagnetic model for planetary orbits and the reversal of retrograde rotation.

"The reversal which takes place from time to time of the motion of the universe. ... Of all changes of the heavenly motions, we may consider this to be the greatest and most complete. " -- Plato, philosopher, The Statesman, 360 B.C.

"There did really happen, and will again happen, like many other events of which ancient tradition has preserved the record, the portent which is traditionally said to have occurred in the quarrel of Atreus and Thyestes. ... how the sun and the stars once rose in the west, and set in the east, and that the god reversed their motion, and gave them that which they now have as a testimony to the right of Atreus. " -- Plato, philosopher, The Statesman, 360 B.C.

"Thus the whole period is eleven thousand three hundred and forty years; in all of which time (they said) they had had no king who was a god in human form, nor had there been any such either before or after those years among the rest of the kings of Egypt. Four times in this period (so they told me) the sun rose contrary to experience; twice he came up where he now goes down, and twice went down where he now comes up." -- Herodotos, historian, Book II, ~440-420 B.C.

"The example of the magnet I have hit upon is a very pretty one, and entirely suited to the subject; indeed, it is little short of being the very truth." -- Johannes Kepler, astronomer/mathematician, 1609

"It is therefore plausible, since the Earth moves the moon through its species and magnetic body, while the sun moves the planets similarly through an emitted species, that the sun is likewise a magnetic body." -- Johannes Kepler, astronomer/mathematician, 1609

"But come: let us follow more closely the tracks of this similarity of the planetary reciprocation [libration] to the motion of a magnet, and that by a most beautiful geometric demonstration, so that it might appear that a magnet has such a motion as that which we perceive in the planet." -- Johannes Kepler, astronomer/mathematician, 1609

"...the great truth, accidentally revealed and experimentally confirmed, is fully recognized, that this planet, with all its appalling immensity, is to electric currents virtually no more than a small metal ball...." -- Nikola Tesla, physicist, 1904


Anaconda said...

@ OilIsMastery:

The experiment in itself is quite illustrative of electromagnetic properties.

One level of resonance (if I may call it resonance [induced by the speed of the rotating magnets] ) causes the rotating steel ball to act in a loop-d-loop configuration.

I can't help but see a pattern that simulates synchrotron radiation (electrons spiralling around a magnetic field.


Great going, finding this series of experiments, I can't wait to see them all.

This one alone provides a great illustration of the power of resonance and the "magnetic vortex" principle of electromagnetics.

This experiment is as if "abstract" or schematic illustrations of electromagnetism were given "physical form and brought to life"!

The rotation within rotation (as the experimenter commented in an aside, "like the Earth" is powerfully suggestive that electromagnetism is much more central to planet orbit and rotation than currently acknowledged.

Interestingly and curiously, this seems in an odd way to invoke ptolomaic "circles within circles" crystal spheres. Could it be that ptolomaic formalism was wrong, but at an intuitive level was not too far off?

It seems as often as "intuitive" ideas of Man can be wrong, it also seems that "intuitive" ideas of Man can also be right, and not just "twice a day" in the old joke about broken clocks.

I'm not sure -- this is a "first impression", thinking out loud comment.

Still, all and all, it is very impressive.

I'm left more convinced than ever that electromagnetism is the key to the Universe, not gravity.

As to your major premise about "rotation" which has been a source of disagreement: Remember, not only "rotation" was effected, but "orbit" as well.

(Actually, "orbit" was the principle "disturbance" demonstrated in the experiment, not "rotation".)

And "transitions" would have been catatrophic, not, "oh, one moring the Sun just happened to rise in the West instead of the East."

All the above being said, and not to dwell on disagreements, but to remark on excellent work:

Well done, OilIsMastery, as I stated, above, this "magnetic vortex", for that is what the spinning magnets resemble, opens up "worlds" of physical demonstration of principles that until now where sometimes too abstract for my taste.

It is the physical demonstration and explanation of physical phenomenon that enlightens the Mind of Man, not mathematical equations, however, precise. Among his many criticisms of mathematics in physics, Bill Gaede is correct to challenge mathematical description as a substitute for explanation: It is not.

I now think I'm closer to understanding resonance, which always eluded me before, and suggests "resonance" is the ultimate key to complete control and understanding of electromagnetism for Man's purposes and use.

Resonance seems to be the overall "control panel" for the individual physical behavior patterns of electrons and ions.


Armine said...


This is Armine Hareyan writing from I visited your blog and liked your content.

Would you be interested to send us a guest post on any of the issues related to the topics that you cover in your blog. We will publish it in our site

In return with each guest blog we will give one link in the author's biline back to your blog. We only ask that the guest post ( we prefer it be a news coverage, sources can be Google News, CNN, MSNBC, Yahoo News, BBC and others) be a unique story and not be published in your blog.

Please let me know if you may have any questions about

If you want to consult the topic with me first that's perfectly fine as well.

Many thanks

Best regards
Armine Hareyan

OilIsMastery said...


Isn't it beautiful? I think it's one of the most beautiful things I've ever seen. Almost too good to be true it's so simple.

OilIsMastery said...


Welcome and thanks. Sounds like a big project but I'm willing to put some effort in. Is there a topic that most appeals to you?

Anonymous said...

OK, this is very interesting and I haven't watched the whole video but did note that the 2 arms on the ball coalesced after severe rotation, before the driving magnetic fields were reduced and then things started to reverse in rotation.

First problem is that the spatial orientation of the 2 arms on the test ball were in different configurations for anticloclock wise motion versus subsequent clockwise motion.

Second problem is that the experiment, while novel and real, does not model any known system, and hence the question, what does it represent - the dynamics of a planet orbiting it's sun? NO!

Third problem - spinning magnets mechanically around a centre means what in physical terms? Where is this observed in Nature?

Spinning magnets in the Earth's electric field will generate electric currents that then affect the test sphere (with its two arms).

OIM - you might think about the Chicken and Egg conundrum, which came first, the egg or chicken? So also the magnetic field, or the electric current.

The problem seems to lie in our approach in connecting causes and effects.