Thursday, October 15, 2009

Magnetricity



"Magnetic current is the same as electric current. Current is [actually] a wrong expression. Really it is not one current, they are two currents, one current is composed of North Pole individual magnets in concentrated streams and the other is composed of South Pole individual magnets in concentrated streams, and they are are running one stream against the other stream in whirling, screwlike fashion, and with high speed." -- Edward Leedskalnin, stone mason, 1945

BBC: 'Magnetic electricity' discovered. (Hat tip: David Lane)

Researchers have discovered a magnetic equivalent to electricity: single magnetic charges that can behave and interact like electrical ones.

The work is the first to make use of the magnetic monopoles that exist in special crystals known as spin ice.

Writing in Nature journal, a team showed that monopoles gather to form a "magnetic current" like electricity.

The phenomenon, dubbed "magnetricity", could be used in magnetic storage or in computing.

Magnetic monopoles were first predicted to exist over a century ago, as a perfect analogue to electric charges.

8 comments:

Anaconda said...

Does the monopole hypothesis of Ed Leedskalnin have merit?

Let's shotgun some things:

Double helix

Rope hypothesis

Counterwailing waves (scalor waves)

Z-pinch

Magnetic reconnection

Expanding Earth theory

Bikreland currents

Space tornadoes

D.C. generator

Plasmoids

Extreme ball lightning

Some of these won't jump out at you, but with a little fleshing out it begins to fill in the picture.

Quantum_Flux said...

Way to leap a whole mile there Anaconda.

Hmmmm, magnetic monopoles and magnetricity. All I can say is that monopoles diverge from the source, actually in opposite directions, save for magnetic field bending due to some kind of magnetic permeable medium.

How are the monopoles created?

BF said...

Hi Oils, everyone

You may be interested to learn that Cambridge University Press today launched a book by Dr. Curt Suplee called The Plasma Universe. The book looks like it might hold promise with regard to electric universe theory as well as Tesla’s limitless and wireless source of energy. As you probably know already, Cambridge is a major bastion of the Big Bang theory which makes the publication of this books by the university's publishing arm a pretty significant event.

http://www.cambridge.org/us/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=9780521519274

If you ask me, preparations are afoot to abandon untenable theories that have held sway until now. I suspect the first of these to fall could be the standard gas model of the Sun.

Anaconda said...

Quantum_Flux: "Way to leap a whole mile there Anaconda."

I guess I still got some spring in those ol' legs afterall :-)

Anti-Parallel Double Helical Electromagnetic Interaction Theory

Yes, sounds like a lot...it is a lot, but it just may be that there is a better model out there that will enable Man to do more things, or should I say control the physical world's dynamics better.

I'll elaborate more if OilIsMastery keeps up this line of inquiry.

Quantum_Flux said...

@Anaconda: Well, it was best to watch those videos at 16x speed to get to the point. It looks like all that shows is the building of a transformer and an oscillating of the polarity of a magnet through a loop to create a current in a wire. There are ferromagnets on pendulums that are being repelled/stopped via the magnetic field lines of the wire. That 3rd video is just another transformer. That 4th video is just the butthead talking about something.

Anaconda said...

@ Quantum_Flux:

Sometimes I think you are a good kid.

But then you come out with statements like the one above, then I remember you are snotty nosed little kid just trying to fit in.

Quantum_Flux, you are either careless or disingenuous because you misrepresent what is going on in the videos in the linked material.

This is no surprise really, I made a matter of fact comment about mathematics not necessarily being reality in a prior post and your knee-jerk reaction was to take a personal shot at me.

Here you are willing to lie to protect your mathematical world-view.

Quantum_Flux: "It looks like all that shows is the building of a transformer and an oscillating of the polarity of a magnet through a loop to create a current in a wire."

False, there are no moving parts on the PMH experimental apparatus.

QF: "There are ferromagnets on pendulums that are being repelled/stopped via the magnetic field lines of the wire."

Two seperate demonstrations, one with an apparatus the other with an electrified metal rod.

You failed to understand the significance of that experimant/demonstration: That the polarity of the magnetic field in the metal rod was alternating because of the twisting monopoles.

That shouldn't happen per the conventional model of Electromagnetics.

To bad Quantum_Flux didn't have the maturity to actually deal with the results of the experiment instead of mis-reporting the results.

What's this hostile reaction by Quantum_Flux all about?

Simple, if this model has validity and the conventional electromagnetic model is wrong, then Quantum Mechanics is completely exposed as wrong and worse is exposed a a weak follow along exercise in self-justification built on phantoms and ghosts (a failed model) that has no basis in reality.

And all the followers?

Exposed as a herd of ungulates munching on grass before they go to the slaughter.

Quantum_Flux, thanks for exposing your attitude and motivation.

OilIsMastery said...

BF,

Thx!

Quantum_Flux said...

False, there are no moving parts on the PMH experimental apparatus.

Well, that you see in the camera :)

Videos show a lot more than the words say.